Explain the origins of the term BRICS

Explain the tunes of the term BRICSSubmitted byFull Name(s) IsabelFull Surname Rodrguez RodrguezTHE ORIGINS OF THE BRICSIntroductionJim ONeill coined in 2001 a unused acronym that could little terror the established world order after the Cold War suggesting that four emerging economies will dominate it by 2050. These countries are Brazil, Russia, India and China shaping the invent BRIC and, from 2011 South Africa, added an S to the term and becoming BRICS. The aim of this es give voice is to bring the reader closer to the creation of this aforementioned stave off so discussed in the medieval decade. I will argue that although in the beginning could be understood as a term merely associated with investment in the countries mentioned above, it had been changed into a block of cooperation with a common objective have a stronger voice in the worlds politics. In the first paragraph, I will explain the origin of the term BRIC by Goldman and Sachs, in the second I will do a brief anal ysis ofthe first upside of the group and the relevance of it and finally, in the third one I will argue that BRICS are non only meant for condescension but also politics.DiscussionThe term BRIC appears for the first cadence in 2001 to refer to the emerging economies of Brazil, Russia, India and China in a paper called Building Better Global Economic BRICs2 written by Jim ONeill and publish by the American investment bank Goldman Sachs. In the text, Jim ONeill argues that we cannot underestimate the countries mentioned below because those will be the future world powers. These countries were selected because its impressive economic growth, and then they will be crucial in worlds GDP. According to the author, China and India will become the suppliers of services and technology while Brazil and Russia would do the same for raw materials. In fact, even in the much pessimistic scenario (extrapolating the growing rate of 2000 in future years), in the following 10 years, the BRICs w ould fall out a 12% in worlds GDP, pushed by China that will be the fifth largest economy in the world. For this reason, BRICs must have more representation in international forums and reach a representative voting, in special in G7 (Germany, Canada, United States, France, Italy and the United Kingdom) suggesting that they should change in a G9 in order to guarantee a correct representation. Two years later, in 2003, Goldman Sachs published another paper called Dreaming With BRICs The track to 20503 claiming that BRICS would have a big GDP than the G6 by 2050. However, the BRICs hypothesis has critics that claim that the term was created to foster the emerging countries as solid economies for long-term investment through a new classification from right developing countries to BRIC in the same way that is more attractive to say Asian Tigers than the name of the four countries themselves.4 Even the acronym suggests the image of a brick solid, compact and heavy that it is aligned with the title of the first above mentioned paper. The title of the second paper Dreaming with BRICS the path for 2050 also suggests that readers imagine the potential value for the emerging economies of BRICs5. It sharpens the interest of Goldman Sachs in their own business, that its sell monetary services. Probably we will not know for sure if it was just a way to promote their products of emerging countries, but is it undeniable that it was used as a catalyser for the economies involved.6Although the Goldman Sachs paper was published in 2001, the first BRICs summit was not held until 2009 in Yekaterinburg (Russia), disrespect the dialogue started in 2006 in New York7. It was attended by the leaders Lula da Silva (from Brazil), Medvedev (Russia), Singh (India) and Jintao (China). It is relevant the year, in the middle of the financial crisis they needed to show strength, stability, and confidence as President Lula claimed We stand out because in recent years our four economies have shown robust growth. mass between us has go up 500% since 2003. This helps explain wherefore we now generate 65% of world growth, which makes us the main hope for a swift recovery from global box (Lula da Silva 2009). It is not difficult to understand why even if we would think the forecast of Goldman Sachs was not realistic it was highly relevant the first summit if we consider the data of the countries involved. initiative, in that location are big countries, they represent the 40% of the surface area of the world and lastly, there are in strategic positions. Second, there are countries with dense population, in fact, they are the largest countries by population having a 50% of the worlds population. Third, regarding economics there contribute with a 22% of the worlds GDP, being relevant the impressive growth rates, especially the case of China that did reach almost a 15% of growth in 20078. It is also to cozy up the third summit in Sanya (China) in 2011 in which Sout h Africa joined the BRICs, adding an S to the acronym and becoming BRICS.However, we cannot forget how different these countries are, as a matter of fact, they do not even share the same political ideology and they have some very diverse perspectives on topics such as nuclear weapons. Then, why would they want to cooperate? Cooperation creates less dependence of the West in terms of trade, especially because they were no longer indulgent with the previous agreement of the World Trade Organization that shows the influence of the United States and European Union9. Cooperation also promotes the trade between the members, in 2001 was 21 million dollars in contrast to 280.000 million in 2014, it is to say that the trade rose more than 13 times.10 Also, together they have much more bargaining power to balance the hegemony of the West, the representation on the financial initiation such as World Bank or International Monetary Fund is very low11. In fact, the reform of the IMFs quotas in 2 010 could be visual perception as a direct success for the BRICS although it became effective in 2016.12 Others scholars believe that the real goal of the BRICs summit was a call for cooperation between the countries due to the similarities of their issues (poverty, wellness care or food security) that is to say the transition towards a middle-income status.13 It is undeniable that the relationship between them is at least singular because they think that the BRICS is meant for cooperation and not for conflict, the direct principles are non-interferenceand national sovereignty14. For instance, Brazil did not criticise Russias annexation of Crimea showing to the world a united front15. As evidence shows it is much more than an intra-cooperation, the Russian president said The global problems cannot be effectively solved without the involvement of the BRICs countries16 which give an idea of the political relevance that they wanted to achieve. The advantages of cooperation are not jus t relative to trade but also politics.ConclusionThe BRIC was an acronym coined by Jim ONeill to refer to the emerging economies of Brazil, Russia, India and China. Although there is evidence that the term could help to promote financial products, it was also a catalyser for the economies involved. Although it took 8 years for the idea behind the BRICs to make true and another two years to became BRICS with a capital S stand up for South Africa, the five countries have impressive figures in terms of population, GDP and growth which lead to a very successful cooperation. Despite that they do not share some core values (for instance, ideology) they cooperate showing to the world a united front thanks to the principle of no-interference. Together, they have the tools to promote trade between them but also to reach more bargaining power in order to balance the West in worlds politics. The BRICS is not only a coalition for promoting trade or discuss domestic issues but also a way to make sure that their voice is heard.1 duty assignment RequirementsEach participant is anticipate to take a 2,000 word essay.The written piece should include a rigorous analysis of key issues raised and their hardness the text should be clear, readable, and follow standard academic publishing conventions, including appropriate quoting, footnoting and bibliographic referencing.Your essay can contain around 10% more or less words of the required word counting, i.e around 100 words more or less than 2000.The following is a suggested put that you are expected to useFont type and size Arial at 11 pointLine spacing 1.5Alignment Fully justified.Prior to typing in/pasting the limit of your assignment on page two of this document, please ensure that your text has been formatted in accordance with the above requirements as you wont be able to format it within this document.Prior to submission, please name the finalised and formatted document in accordance with the following pattern Surname N ame Module 1 Final Essay, e.g. get-up-and-go John Module 1 Final EssayThe deadline for submission of written piece is Thursday 23rd March before 1700.Please submit your assignments via LSE GDP 2017 Custom Programme Moodle webpage.2 Jim ONeill, Building Better Global Economic BRICs Global Investment Research, Goldman Sachs, 2001 Available at http//www.goldmansachs.com/our-thinking/archive/archive-pdfs/build-better-brics.pdf3 Dominic Wilson, Roopa Purushothaman Dreaming With BRICs The Path to 2050 Global Investment Research, Goldman Sachs ,2003. Available at http//www.goldmansachs.com/our-thinking/archive/brics-dream.html4 Leon Wansleben, Dreaming with BRICs, Journal of cultural Economy 6, no.4 (2013) p.4 inside10.1080/17530350.2012.756826.5 Ibid.6 Ibid., p.67 Oliver Stuenkel, Emerging Powers and position The Case of the First Brics Summit. Asian Perspective 38, no. 1. p.3 http//vex.com/vid/amerging-powers-status-brics-summit-494287502.8 Data IMF. World Development Indicators Ac cessed 10 March, 2017 http//data.worldbank.org/datacatalog/world-development-indicators9 Zaki Ladi, BRICS soverignity power and weakness International Politics 49, no. 5 (2012) 614-32., p.5 doi10.1057/ip.2012.17.10 WTO database Datos Comerciales y Arancelarios Accessed 10 March, 2017 Available at https//www.wto.org/spanish/res_s/statis_s/its2015_s/its15_highlights_s.pdf11 Michael Cox, Towards a BRIC world? Lecture, London School of Economics Custom Programs, 7th march 201712 Stuenkel, Emerging Powers and Status p., 213 Stuenkel, Emerging Powers and Status p., 1114 Pedro Morazn et al., The role of BRICS in the developing world p., 5 (Luxembourg EUR-OP, 2012)15 Stuenkel, Oliver. Why Brazil Has not Criticised Russia over Crimea. The Norse Peacebuilding Resource Centre. https//www.files.ethz.ch/isn/180529/65655a04cd21b64dbcc9c8a823a8e736.pdf.16 Oliver Stuenkel, Brics And The Future Of Global Order Lanham Lexington Books, 2016.